Connect with us


Should independent candidacy be restored?



It was his first baptism of fire in politics. In 1955, Abraham Adesanya, a fresh law graduate and a household name in Ijebu-Igbo, unfolded his ambition. As a member of the defunct Action Group (AG), led by the late Chief Obafemi Awolowo, he sought the House of Assembly ticket to represent the old Ijebu Igbo Constituency. Party elders asked him to hold on, promising to give it to him in 1959. Adesanya refused, saying that he was popular.

He hurriedly left the AG and contested as an independent candidate. Despite his popularity among the electorate, he lost his deposit at the poll. He retraced his steps to the party and he was later elected on its platform in 1959. Twenty years later, Adesanya became a Unity Party of Nigeria (UPN) senator from Ogun East.

The same scenario played out in Akure, the headquarter of the old Ondo Province. Akinola Aguda, the first indigene of Akure to become a lawyer, wanted to represent the constituency in the Western Regional House of Assembly. He decided to run as an independent candidate against the AG and National Council of Nigerian Citizens (NCNC) candidates, contrary to the advice of his friend and colleague at the bar, Ayotunde Rosiji. The people of the constituency rejected him at the poll.

In Ijebu East Constituency, Oluwole Awokoya, the former Minister of Education in the defunct Western Region, sought re-election into the House of Assembly in 1955. The AG, having rejected his ambition, drafted Solanke Onasanya into the race. When Awokoya lost the ticket to Onasanya, he decided to contest as an independent candidate. He lost at the poll.

But, at Ibadan, it was a different ball game. A prominent chief, Samuel Odulana, contested for the House of Representatives as an independent candidate in the early sixties. Then, the AG and NCNC)/Nigeria National Democratic Party (NNDP) were locked in a battle of supremacy in Ibadan. Lana, as he was fondly called, won. He became the Parliamentary Secretary to the Prime Minister, the late Alhaji Abubakar Tafawa Balewa. Many years after, Odulana became the Olubadan of Ibadanland.

Independent candidacy is not new. There was room for it under the parliamentary system in the First Republic. Across the constituencies, there were some independent candidates who either won or lost during the regional and federal parliamentary elections. However, majority of them were aggrieved defectors from major parties who wanted to ride to power on the strength of their individual popularity within their constituencies.

Following the adoption of the presidential system, independent candidacy was abolished in 1979. In the Second Republic, the ill-fated Third Republic and since 1999, the practice has become old-fashioned. To be an elected councillor, member of the House of Assembly, Representatives, Senate, governor and president, membership of a political party is compulsory.

Opinion is divided on the agitation for independent candidacy. What has motivated critics to clamour for the restoration of independent candidacy is the perceived politics of exclusion by party leaders and elders in major parties. Internal democracy in the political parties has been a major bone of contention. In their view, if there is room for independent candidacy, the fate of certain aspirants and candidates will have to be determined directly on poll day by the electorate.

Party leaders have often sought to defend the alleged discriminatory approach, pointing out that party guidelines are meant to prevent the hijack of the parties by money bags who invade the platform, without any history of ideological affinity and belief in party ethos.

The Constitutional and Electoral Reform Committee, led by former Senate President Ken Nnamani, had recommended independent candidacy in its report. Senator Stella Oduah, who is one of its advocates in the National Assembly, said it will halt the imposition of candidates by party leaders and pave the way for the emergence of leaders trusted by the people. “It has worked in the United States. It is a global best practice. It will give the electorate to choose who they want,” he added.

Second Republic governor of old Kaduna State Alhaji Balarabe Musa supported the proposal, saying that it will give room for a wider choice for voters. “It widens the choice of electorates and democracy is strengthened. If the electorate don’t like the candidates presented by the political parties, they can support an independent candidate they like,” he added. The elder statesman said while an independent candidate may not win the presidency because money plays a great role at that level, he can win elections at the lower level.

In the United States, former President George Washington was elected as an independent candidate. In 2007, Bernie Sanders was elected into the Congress in the US as an independent.

In Australia, Andrew Wilkie from Denison in Tasmania and Cathy McGowan from Indi in Victoria became legislators as independent candidates in the House of Representatives. Senator John Madigan became an independent senator in September 2014 while Senator Jacqui Lambie and Glenn Lazarus became independent senators in November 2014 and March 2015 respectively.

In Canada, Chuck Cadman from British Columbia of Surrey North was elected to the federal parliament as an independent in 2004.

In Germany, Joachim Gauck became president in 2012.

The Legislative Council in Hong Kong is dominated by independents.

In Iceland, President Olafur Ragnar Grimsson was an independent. Also, the ninth Prime Minister of Iceland, Bjorn Poroarson, was an independent.

After the 2011 elections in Ireland, there were 16 independents in the lower parliament and12 independent senators in the Upper House.

In Italy, Prime Ministers Carlo Azeglio Ciampi (1993-1994), Lamberto Dini (1995-1996), Giuliano Amato (2000 -2001) and Mario Monti (2011-2013) were independent candidates.

In Kosovo, Atifete Jahjaga was elected the first female and independent President, not only for Kosovo, but the entire Balkans.

In Malaysia, there are more than four independent legislators in the parliament.

An independent candidate, Jaime Heliodoro Rodriguez Calderon, was elected governor of Nuevo Leon. He made history as the first independent candidate to win election in the country.

In the Philippines, Noli de Castro, former Vice President, ran as senator in 2001 with no political affiliation and he had the highest votes in history.

In Russia, former President Dimitry Medvedev and Vladimir Putin became presidents as independents. Although Putin became the head of the United Russia Party, he is not a member of the party.

In United Kingdom, a journalist, Marthin Bell, was elected at Tatton into the House of Commons 1997 on an anti-corruption platform. He was the first independent to be elected to the Commons since 1951.

But, how popular is the clamour for independent candidacy in Nigeria? In its report, the All Progressives Congress (APC) Committee on Restructuring, led by Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai, stated that 67 per cent of respondents were opposed to independent candidacy. “There is support for independent candidacy from the Northcentral, Northeast, Southwest, the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) and online respondents. However, opposition to independent candidacy is stronger than support for it among respondents from the three northern zones,” it added.

Despite the seeming popular opposition to independent candidacy, the committee recommended that the APC should support its restoration, saying that the practice will widen the political space. According to the report, “the party should note that this is popular among members of the National Assembly who have already approved it as part of their constitution amendment and awaiting adoption by the Houses of Assembly.”

If independent candidacy becomes inevitable, the panel suggested that it will be necessary to introduce strong eligibility criteria and process checks to prevent abuse, especially by attention-seeking candidates who will demand their inclusion on the ballot papers and thereafter use it to create crises for the electoral process. “It is necessary and important to ensure that INEC is not inundated and overwhelmed by a large number of independent candidates, some of whom may be unserious,” the report added.

For constitutional guarantee, the panel recommended the amendment of Sections 65(2), 106 (d), 131 (c), 176 (c) and 187 of the 1999 Constitution and Section 87 of the Electoral Act, 2010. The committee pointed out that the amendment of the Electoral Act will provide strong eligibility criteria, which must be met by the independent candidates.

The committee recommended four criteria: the independent candidate should not be a member of a registered political party for at least six months before the date set for the election in which he intends to contest; his nominators must not be members of any registered party; he must pay a deposit to INEC in the same range as the non-refundable deposit fee payable by candidates sponsored by political parties, which amount shall be determined by an Act of the National Assembly; and the candidate must also meet other qualification requirements provided for by the constitution or any other law.

Former Information Minister Prince Tony Momoh said independent candidacy should not be a priority, stressing that aspirants are free to join any of the 45 political parties to realise their ambition. He said while independent candidacy may be plausible during councillorship election, an independent candidate may not make any impression at the governorship and presidential elections.

There is no shadow poll for an independent candidate. The hurdle of primary is removed. A lawyer, Henry Kelechukwu, said although the proposal is good, the bill on the independent candidacy, if it becomes law, is capable of denying the electorate the chance to vet the candidate through the primary. He said the peculiarity in Nigeria and its level of socio-political development may affect its implementation. “Our level of political development already set a faulty foundation that is going to make the bill, if passed to law, to be susceptible to abuse by politicians,” Kelechukwu added.

A two-time member of the Lagos State House of Assembly, Hon. Saka Fafunmi said independent candidacy may keep candidates running on platforms of political parties on their toes. However, he doubted the success of the option. The lawmaker from Ifako-Ijaye Constituency said: “Do you think an independent candidate can win election by having so much money? You do so by coming through a party. It is just going to be an exercise in futility.”

Kwararafa Reporters Administrator
Sorry! The Author has not filled his profile.
Kwararafa Reporters Administrator
Sorry! The Author has not filled his profile.

Facebook Comments
Continue Reading
Click to comment


Opprobrious NASS And The 2019 Budget-By Gabriel Ikese



The ideal of popular election of Legislators is generally regarded as admirable. Yet the selection process does not always permit the widest possible choices. And that has been our albatross here in Nigeria. The legislature is expected to reflect the electorate’s preferences, but that is in the Whiteman countries, not in our clime. In the 8th session of the National Assembly, it is rarely the case. If you followed the antecedents of our lawmakers and the trajectory of the NASS, you will obviously smell the dead rat.

In saner democracies around the globe, the legislature is an institution of reputable model for discipline and patriotism. It is the sanctimonious fulcrum of any working democracy as showcased in the America system. Legislators were embodiment of untainted character with high level of integrity, uprightness and moral decency. But that is clearly not our portion as the difference is miles apart.

Perhaps for the enormity of our sins against God the Father, He decided to inflict us with such pains, not with epidemic disease as alluded to by Governor Yari of Zamfara State, but allowing this 8th class of Lawmakers to represent us. The 8th NASS appears to be completely deficient of any sterling qualities and became the cynosure of chronic legislative rascality, demonic impunity and financial impudence.

Another budget session is here again, and the NASS has begun to manifest the usual symptoms of chronic insensitivity and unpardonable cluelessness. They are poised to throw up another frivolous mischief to undermine the 2019 budget process even before it is laid on the floor of the combine congress. The recurring acrimonious uproar that accompanied the passing of our budgets over the past 3 years is regrettably appalling.

Members of the House of Representatives at plenary has threatened to boycott the anticipated presentation of 2019 budget estimate by President Muhammadu Buhari over an alleged comment by the Minister of Budget and National Planning, Udo Udoma. The dignity of our lawmakers has greatly eroded. Their insensitivity to the plight of citizens is obviously very legendary.

Members could not choose a better time to demonstrate their folly, but when government is trying to consolidate on the progress at sustaining the economic growth with a sound budget proposal for 2019. They decided to lash on a frivolous and unsubstantiated allegation to sabotage the smooth passing of the 2019 Budget proposal. This irritating arrogance is the height of insensibility without even batting an eye lid to the reality of the plight of Nigerians that are dependent on the budget for sustenance and development.

The House dissipated so much energies and time discussing irrelevant and baseless allegation by a Minister accusing them of the delay in the presentation of the 2019 Budget. It is a surprise that the House would threaten to frustrate the budget process on a mere allegation that is largely irrelevant, and has not compromised the content of the 2019 budget.

Members were so serious that they vigorously amplified a derogatory word that the Minister LIED on television. It is an unparliamentary word that the Speaker, Yakubu Dogara, carefully avoided in his response. To support their frustration, a member went further to cite Order Six, Rule 14 of the laws of the House alluding to a breech on his privilege and that of the House, and claiming that the Minister portrayed members of the NASS as “irresponsible people before Nigerians”.

Our lawmakers are good with their imaginations. If that is the line of thinking, then I will support any reasonable action that will prove the correctness or contrary of this line of thought. The Hallowed Chamber should not accommodate irresponsible characters that would bring the legislature to disrepute. With all seriousness, member should probe what perception ordinary Nigerians hold of their integrity. And would also probe their conscience and take a good look at the mirror. Perhaps, they will get answers that would satisfy their curiosities.

Be that as it may, the alleged remark by the Honourable Minister should not be enough reason for members to boycott the Budget presentation by the President. Such action would not only be irrational, it will be illogical and unpatriotic. Doing so will only confirm the allusion that members are indeed irresponsible and insensitive to the realities of the adverse effect a further delay in passing the 2019 budget could cause the economy.

Our budgets cannot continue to suffer unnecessary and avoidable delay after presentations. The primary responsibility of NASS is to make laws, such as the proposed 2019 budget, which will help to grow the economy. Lawmakers cannot be lackadaisical in passing the budget for whatsoever reason. Presenting the 2019 budget proposals in December should not be an excuse to delay the passing of the bill within reasonable time. 2017 and 2018 budgets were presented November, fairly reasonable time frame but still lingered for over 5 months at the National Assembly.

Members of the legislature should be patriotic enough to put aside personal interests and frivolous allegations from any quarters for the overriding national interest in passing the budget expeditiously. With commitment and adequate capacity, the budget can be passed in 30 working days. Hon Sergius Ogun, representing Esan North/East Constituency, said on National Television that the Nigerian Financial Intelligent Unit (NFIU) bill was passed in 8 working days when the Egmont Group suspended Nigeria and threatened expulsion from the group over lack of autonomy. Therefore there is no reason the 2019 budget bill will not be accorded with such attention and speed.

It is sad that lawmakers would value treachery over integrity and flex muscles over issues of absolute irrelevance. While the budget bill lingers, 71 members of the House of Representatives seek to change the system of government from presidential to parliamentary model in Nigeria. Again, if you ask Nigerians, it is another exercise that would end up in futility. The legislators can easily be predicted. The bill is another channel to corruptly enrich themselves like previous constitutional amendment exercise at the Senate.

The 8th NASS is endowed with remarkable quantity of mischief and insatiable financial lucre. The House sold us a dummy with an orchestrated agenda to deliver legislation in aid of development and reforms aimed at improving conditions of living in Nigeria. That was a fluke. Monetization took over legislative intellectualism and selflessness in lawmaking process in the country. Their arrogance and fastidious desire for luxuries has turned NASS into a chamber of business, which is akin to the biblical Holy Temple of Jerusalem converted to the House of trade and commerce by its entrusted custodians.

NASS members should embrace attitudinal change with the right mindset in the overriding interest of the country. The 2019 budget proposal should be expeditiously considered and passed in record time as a test of integrity and attestation of a responsible legislature. This would change the negative perception of lawmakers and the hallowed institution of the National Assembly.

Ikese writes from Jos

Kwararafa Reporters Administrator
Sorry! The Author has not filled his profile.
Kwararafa Reporters Administrator
Sorry! The Author has not filled his profile.

Facebook Comments
Continue Reading


Nigerian Military And The Act Of Victory-By Richards Murphy



Sun Tzu, the Chinese war veteran, strategist and tactician of world repute, throbs military leaders with this enriching warfare philosophy. Its catchy phrase prescribes thus; “What the ancients called a clever fighter is one who not only wins, but excels in winning with ease.”

I know some Nigerians would be surprised at what prodded me to begin the exploration of this piece with this enthralling wisdom of Gen. Sun Tzu. It’s because Sun Tzu remains the most coveted encyclopedia of war shrewdness ever exposed to mankind.

Tzu was somewhat magical, if not prodigiously extraordinary in thoughts and actions. No frustrations or setback of the enemy ever dissolved his resolve and determination to win. It is the innate inclination of a soldier.

Of course, many of us have read the military exploits and adventures of this great Chinese military celeb. All over the world, craggy military officers, who aim at victories in battles, imbibe his wisdom and style in combats. They are inspired by his combat wits, tenacity and valor. They strive to emulate him.

And for three years and more, Nigeria’s Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) Gen. Gabriel Abayomi Olonisakin knows, he is not just the super engine room of President Muhammadu Buhari’s counter-terrorism war in the country. But the march to terminate the reign of Boko Haram terrorism is an assignment, which must be won and splendidly.

His mien all the times, tells me, the CDS cum military strategist is less concerned by setbacks in the counter-insurgency operations. But he is a thousand times concerned with extracting the victory from terrorists, at the cost of anything.
It is indubitable that anywhere wars are fought; there are countless entrapping impediments and challenges, which can cancel even an already won victory. But careful deployment of uncommon wisdom and the utilization of every resource at your disposal earn you the victories.

And I believe, there is no military rendezvous in warfare, which victory comes easy and smooth. Despite Sun Tzu’s versatility in warfare and acclaimed expertise, not all his victories came on platter gold. To be candid to myself, I have a passion for this warrior. What he never consented was a weakened spirit at the battlefront.

At all times and in all circumstances, he was confident victory would descend at dawn undeniably and kept cracking the hardest of nuts. And truly, he got the results in his favour.

But in the course of the usually stiff struggles peculiar to the trenches, I don’t want to believe there were no depressing moments’ or the unexpected never happened, such as troops vehicle accident or death on the warfront. But Tzu’s sheer determination and the courage to succeed kept the candle burning to a victorious end.

I see a facsimile of this resilience in Gen. Olonisakin. When any of his troops is mowed down in battle by enemy forces, it gives him sleepless nights. But it has never enfeebled his determination to the point of surrendering to the enemies of his troops and the nation. Instead, it spurs more grandeur planning and deafening confrontations of the enemies more vehemently.

Throughout the time, I keenly observed the actions and dispositions of the CDS in the engagement of Boko Haram insurgents; no challenge or setback in the prosecution of the war has slackened his pace and focus even for a minute. This is reason the Nigerian military has sustained the winning streaks against terrorists. Insurgents attacks on military formations has now bubbled by a personal revenge in the hearts of troops.

That’s the lesson taught troops by the archetypal Gen. Olonisakin. As a true and inveterate Military General, coordinating and leading counter-terrorism operations in Nigeria deemed one of the world’s most difficult wars has been his passion to end a glorious career.

The CDS has conditioned the minds of his troops to have their eyes fixated on victory; and only victory, at all times, regardless of any obstacle. The CDS knows the whiff of victory is what keeps an Army or a troop going in a battle.

I am glad they have not deviated from this path of glory. And troops have lived it and appear even better at their most tormenting moments; which outsiders like me fear a possible retreat. This is the victorious side of our military, unknown to many of us.

I have observed consistently that whenever Boko Haram terrorists roar against our troops, with such gusto, reenacting their triumphant past, the insurgents deployed for the missions hardly escape unscathed.

We may not know. But many of us have not heard the voice and braggadocio of Boko Haram factional leader, Abubakar Shekau for a long time now. The last time I heard about him was six or so, months ago, when he led his rebellious sect members in tempting Nigerian troops.

The insurgents were not only munched en mass by Nigerian troops, but their Kingpin, Shekau quite possibly escaped with severe injuries. Some reports claim, Shekau has hoed himself in the Cameroonian caves and mountains recuperating. It’s possible he must have died in the course of treatment.

The only factional Boko Haram leader still flexing feeble might is the Musab Al Barnewi faction. But I am sure, fragrance of his day of reckoning have polluted everywhere in the Northeast. I know his waterloo is also near.

And it is one conviction, which has persistently obsessed Gen. Olonisakin. He knows he can do it; the troops are confident that Al Barnewi cannot escape their swords, no matter the hardness of the bulwark he erects around himself.

With ground and air troops at his effective command and control, the CDS is pretty sure, the enemies have; but little chances of survival. Only time is the dividing factor, which he also knows would soon decide in the favor of Nigerian troops and Nigerians. The CDS like the veteran Tzu is aware, “What is essential in war is victory, not prolonged operations.”

Like Sun Tzu, the CDS knows too perfectly that; “When torrential water tosses boulders, it is because of its momentum. When the strike of a hawk breaks the body of its prey, it is because of timing.”

I appeal to Nigerians to look beyond the outward when assessing our military. We are bound to see the treasures embedded in them which are envied by the world. We must be proud of our possession and our military assets in these troops.

The military gentleman and unstinting professional officer, Gen. Olonishakin is eager to handover to Nigerians the crown and medal victory over Boko Haram terrorism. I read his lips and feel the yearning of a leader who wishes to accomplish this feat as his parting gift to Nigerians before his retirement.

Gen. Olonisakin knows he has an edge over the terrorists, by leading three arms of the Nigerian military. But the insurgents can only dream of repressing or even defeating the Nigerian military.

It’s clear to me, coordinating the security operations across the country, the CDS adheres to Tzu’s caution that “Management of many is the same as management of few. It is a matter of organization.” We shall keep praying for their success fervently.

Murphy is a security consultant based in Calabar.

Kwararafa Reporters Administrator
Sorry! The Author has not filled his profile.
Kwararafa Reporters Administrator
Sorry! The Author has not filled his profile.

Facebook Comments
Continue Reading


Taraba N450m Presidential Campaign Fund: Why Was His Excellency, Distinguished Sen. Sani Abubakar Targeted- By Omar Al-Farooq



The case involving the former Acting Governor of Taraba State and the APC Gubernatorial Candidate His Excellency, Distinguished Sen. Sani Abubakar Danladi, former Speaker Taraba State House of Assembly Mark Bako Useni and former Minister of Labour and Productivity Sen. Joel Danlami Ikenya by the EFCC for conspiracy and violation of financial regulations contrary to Section 18(a) and 16(2a) of the Money Laundering Act 2011 as amended at the Federal High Court Jalingo has comes up for arraignment today.

Two of the three defendants so far accused by the EFCC Hon. Mark Useni and Sen. Joel Danladi Ikenya were present in the court while His Excellency, Distinguished Sen. Sani Abubakar Danladi was absent for not been duly served. The case was therefore adjourned to January 15, 2019 for arraignment.

In a mix reaction on this development, political pundits and interest groups across Taraba State were saddened by the fact that the case can be mention and commence with the available two defendants present in the court but adjourned or re-adjourned to another date to enable His Excellency, Distinguished Sen. Sani Abubakar Danladi to appear before the court.

While for his opponents, it is a disappointing day after working assiduously and tirelessly to see that the Incoming Resident Governor of Taraba State His Excellency,
Distinguished Sen. Sani Abubakar Danladi was in their assumption be disgracefully arraigned, prosecuted, convicted, jailed and substituted as the standing bearer of the APC for 2019 Taraba State Gubernatorial Election by the court today.

It may interest all Tarabans to know that, this is not a case of siphoning state treasury or diversion of fund meant for Taraba State for the execution of projects that has direct bearing to the development of the state or to the lives of its citizens. This is a case of a N450 million 2015 Presidential Campaign Fund sent by the former President Goodluck Jonathan to facilitate his campaign and election in Taraba State and it involved so many personalities in the state. But why is it that His Excellency, Distinguished Sen. Sani Abubakar Danladi is the ONLY TARGET even when the other two defendants are present in the court?

It is glaring that, all attempts to label His Excellency, Distinguished Sen. Sani Abubakar Danladi as corrupt and cover others in Taraba State has fallen flat in the face of emerging facts surrounding the investigation of the N450M Presidential Fund.

At the time when the N450 million Presidential Campaign Fund will be send to Taraba State for Presidential campaign in March 2015, His Excellency, Distinguished Sen. Sani Abubakar Danladi as the Acting Governor of the State then refused to used Taraba State Government Account to received the money neither does he used his personal account to received the money as he has nothing to do with the money. The then Minister of Labour and Productivity Sen. Joel Danlami Ikenya and the then Speaker of Taraba State House of Assembly Hon. Mark Useni Used their personal accounts in receiving the money. They are the ones who signed and collected the fund from Fidelity Bank before proceeding to Taraba State Government House for distribution as can be seen on RECEIPT OF PAYMENT attached hereto.

EIGHT (8) Man SHARING COMMITTEE was set up to distribute the money across Taraba State which include the following:-

  1. His Excellency, Distinguished Sen. Sani Abubakar Danladi- The then Acting Governor and now APC Gubernatorial Candidate, Taraba State
  2. His Excellency, Arch. Darius Dickson Ishaku- The then PDP Gubernatorial Candidate and now Executive Governor of Taraba State.
  3. Hon. Victor Bala Kona- PDP Chairman, Taraba State
  4. Sen. Emmanuel Bwacha- Senator Taraba South.
  5. Hon. Joel Danlami Ikenya- The then Minister of Labour and Productivity and now APGA Senatorial Candidate, Taraba South Senatorial District
  6. Rev. Jolly T. Nyame- Former Governor, Taraba State.
  7. Hon. Anthony Manzo- Former Senator, Taraba North
  8. Hon. Mark Useni- The then Speaker, Taraba State House of Assembly and currently a member in the State Assembly.

Investigations revealed that during interrogation by the EFCC, Sen. Joel Danlami Ikenya and Hon. Mark Useni (not Sani Abubakar Danladi) admitted that they have signed and received the money for onward distribution as directed by the President Jonathan Campaign Organization. The money was distributed collectively by the Distribution Committee to the 16 local governments in the state.

So, the question that comes to the mind of every right thinking man is that:-
-Why is it that the case is coming up now after when His Excellency, Distinguished Sen. Sani Abubakar Danladi became the APC standing bearer for 2019 Taraba State Gubernatorial election while investigations on the matter was concluded two years ago?

-Why was the outcome of the investigation lopsided and restricted to only three members of the eight man committee?

-What special role did His Excellency, Distinguished Sen. Sani Abubakar Danladi played that his name deserved special mentioning and his presence in the court the only concern of his opponents from within and outside of his party?

-Why is it that His Excellency, Distinguished Sen. Sani Abubakar Danladi remained the only target even when he did not signed, received and distributed the money?

-Why is it that the remaining five members of the committee are not involved in the trial?

-Is it not a smear campaign by his co-contestants for the gubernatorial seat of Taraba State to tarnish his image and block him from becoming the Governor of Taraba State?

-Are those politicians pushing for the arraignment and prosecution of His Excellency, Distinguished Sen. Sani Abubakar Danladi not more corrupt than him?

The signal in this scenario is crystal clear and within the knowledge and understanding of every right thinking Taraban that, it is a case of cheap blackmail and character assassination against the persons of the former Acting Governor of Taraba State and now the hopeful incoming Resident Governor as well as the APC Candidate for the 2019 election His Excellency, Distinguished Sen. Sani Abubakar Danladi by some section of the politicians in the state to stop him from vying the gubernatorial seat of Taraba State.

His Excellency, Distinguished Sen. Sani Abubakar Danladi is a law abiding citizen who is willing to make himself available to any court and to answer any charges on the N450 million 2015 presidential campaign fund sent to Taraba State as he has nothing to do with the money.

What is paramount at the moment is for the gubernatorial candidates to showcase their campaign blueprint to the teeming masses of Taraba State irrespective of their region, tribe, clan, religious and political party affiliations. Stabbing, back-biting, horse-trading and victimization can not move the state forward, it will only succeed in polarizing the state further.

Let us be guided that, this very particular case has no any connection whatsoever with his candidature neither does it have any legal impediment that can warrant his substitution or barred him from contesting the gubernatorial election of Taraba State as there is no any extant or relevant law that provided for such. On this note, for those who are waiting to substitute him on the basis of this case are just wasting their time and misleading their gullible supporters. And for those who are afraid of facing him in the 2019 gubernatorial election, let them know that their conscious does not lied to them that he that they are afraid of, is the one who can consume them.

Tarabans, let us not be distracted. For Taraba State to be indivisible and dependable state for all its citizens were peace, unity and unconditional development can flourish, we must support and vote for His Excellency, Distinguished Sen. Sani Abubakar Danladi as Governor Taraba State under the platform of APC.

Kwararafa Reporters Administrator
Sorry! The Author has not filled his profile.
Kwararafa Reporters Administrator
Sorry! The Author has not filled his profile.

Facebook Comments
Continue Reading